ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Remaining Useful Life Prediction Method for Stochastic Degrading Devices Considering Predictive Maintenance.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensor-Based Channel-Wise Remaining Useful Life Estimation and Multi-Threshold Maintenance Policy for Steel-Cord Conveyor Belts.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reliability Assessment of MEMS Gyroscopes via Dual-Mechanism Synergistic Degradation: A Generalized Linear Model with Physics-Informed Wiener Processes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A New Method of Remaining Useful Lifetime Estimation for a Degradation Process with Random Jumps.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predictive maintenance, recognized as an effective health management strategy for extending the lifetime of devices, has emerged as a hot research topic in recent years. A general method is to execute two separate steps: data-driven remaining useful life (RUL) prediction and a maintenance strategy. However, among the numerous studies that conducted maintenance and replacement activities based on the results of RUL prediction, little attention has been paid to the impact of preventive maintenance on sensor-based monitoring data, which further affects the RUL for repairable degrading devices. In this paper, an adaptive RUL prediction method is proposed for repairable degrading devices in order to improve the accuracy of prediction results and achieve adaptability to future degradation processes. Firstly, a phased degradation model based on an adaptive Wiener process is established, taking into account the impact of imperfect maintenance. Meanwhile, integrating the impact of maintenance activities on the degradation rate and state, the probability distribution of RUL can be derived based on the concept of first hitting time (FHT). Secondly, a method is proposed for model parameter identification and updating that incorporates the individual variation among devices, integrating maximum likelihood estimation and Bayesian inference. Finally, the effectiveness of the RUL prediction method is ultimately validated through numerical simulation and its application to repairable gyroscope degradation data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.