ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
How Accurate Can 2D LiDAR Be? A Comparison of the Characteristics of Calibrated 2D LiDAR Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vision-Aided Velocity Estimation in GNSS Degraded or Denied Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The method of reflection-based marker detection and identification to ensure accurate AGV docking.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The utilization of 2D Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) measurements does not always provide the precision needed to accurately determine the motion range or recalibrate the position of Autonomous Guided Vehicles (AGVs). Consequently, it is essential to employ filtering and calibration methods to enhance the precision and accuracy of measurements derived from 2D LiDAR. The article proposes a multi-sectional calibration (MSC) method incorporating a median filtration (MF) phase to enhance the measurement accuracy of 2D LiDAR. The investigation focused on identifying the optimal window width for the MF module among a selection of 2D LiDAR systems. The division of the complete measurement range into sections resulted in a significant enhancement in sensitivity to deviations in measurements. The efficacy of the proposed method is evidenced by its ability to enhance accuracy in distance measurements by up to 89% for the optimal window width. The experiments indicated that the proposed method has a significant impact on the precision and accuracy of distance measurements for 2D LiDAR systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.