ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Compact Low-Power Chopper Low Noise Amplifier for High Density Neural Front-Ends.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a low-power and area-efficient chopper-stabilized low noise amplifier (CS-LNA) for in-pixel neural recording systems. The proposed CS-LNA can be used in a multi-channel architecture, in which the chopper mixers of the LNA are exploited to provide the time division multiplexing (TDM) of several channels, while reducing the flicker noise and rejecting the Electrode DC Offset (EDO). A detailed noise analysis including the effect of the chopper stabilization on flicker noise, and a design flow to optimize the trade-off between input-referred noise and silicon area are presented, and utilized to design the LNA. The adopted approach to reject the EDO allows to tolerate an input offset of ±50 mV, without appreciably affecting the CS-LNA performance, and does not require an additional DC Servo Loop (DSL). The proposed CS-LNA has been fabricated in a 0.13 μm CMOS process with an area of 0.0268 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.