ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
AI-Assisted Passive Magnetic Distance/Position Sensor.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Methods in Sensor Calibration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Millimeter-Scale Magnetic Positioning Using a Single AMR Sensor and BP Neural Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic sensing technology is crucial for non-contact distance and position measurement. Due to the nonlinear characteristics of the magnetic fields from permanent magnets, conventional magnetic sensors struggle with accurate distance and position determination. To address this, we propose a distance/position sensor that employs a customized back propagation (BP) neural network. By detecting the magnetic field variations induced by a permanent magnet, the proposed sensor can effectively model the nonlinear mapping between magnetic field strength and distance, thereby enabling precise distance and position measurement. Experimental results demonstrate that the BP neural network approach, when employing a single magnetic sensor, exhibits a measurement error in the range of -0.0268 mm to 0.0362 mm over a distance of 0-70 mm, which is significantly lower than traditional methods based on the magnetic dipole model and the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm. Increasing the number of sensors to three reduces the error further to -0.0107 mm to 0.0093 mm. Furthermore, when employing four magnetic sensors for position measurement within a 60 mm × 60 mm planar area, the positioning errors along the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.