ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
ZPTM: Zigzag Path Tracking Method for Agricultural Vehicles Using Point Cloud Representation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic navigation, as one of the modern technologies in farming automation, enables unmanned driving and operation of agricultural vehicles. In this research, the ZPTM (Zigzag Path Tracking Method) was proposed to reduce the complexity of path planning by using a point cloud consisting of a series of anchor points with spatial information, which are obtained from orthophotos taken by UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) to represent the curved path in the zigzag. A local straight path was created by linking two adjacent anchor points, forming the local target path to be tracked, which simplified the navigation algorithm for zigzag path tracking. A nonlinear feedback function was established, using both lateral and heading errors as inputs for determining the desired heading angle of agricultural vehicles, which were guided along the local target path with minimal errors. A GUI (Graphic User Interface) was designed on the navigation terminal to visualize and monitor the working process of agricultural vehicles in automatic navigation, displaying interactive controls and components, including representations of the zigzag path and the agricultural vehicle using affine transformation. A high-clearance sprayer equipped with an automatic navigation system was utilized as the test platform to evaluate the proposed ZPTM. Zigzag navigation tests were conducted to explore the impact of path tracking parameters, including path curvature, moving speed, and spacing between anchor points, on zigzag navigation performance. Based on these tests, a regression model was established to optimize these parameters for achieving accurate and smooth movement. Field test results showed that the maximum error, average error, and RMS (Root Mean Square) error in the zigzag navigation were 3.30 cm, 2.04 cm, and 2.27 cm, respectively. These results indicate that the point cloud path-based ZPTM in this research demonstrates adequate stability, accuracy, and applicability in zigzag navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.