ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comparative Study of Divergent Surface Acoustic Wave Beams' Generation on an Y128° Lithium Niobate Using Various Types of Interdigital Transducers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focuses on the possibility of generating divergent surface acoustic waves (SAWs) with interdigital transducers (IDTs) deposited on Y128° Lithium Niobate for non-destructive testing applications, particularly in the context of manufacturing layer-on-substrate systems for microelectronic components. The selected approach is to diffuse the SAWs over a large surface area and in various directions in order to analyze the structure and detect any defects when using the well-known passive imaging by correlating the diffuse acoustic field. The introduction of SAWs is achieved using offset interdigital transducers that make acoustic contact with the sample under analysis without causing damage. The considered IDTs are characterized based on criteria for maximizing the divergence angle, maximizing SAW emission amplitude, and minimizing the acoustic contact area. Three IDT configurations were tested to compare their performance: (i) a transducer with circular electrodes emitting from its wide convex end; (ii) a circular IDT emitting from its narrow concave end; and (ii) a narrow transducer with an aperture close to two wavelengths. It was shown that the second configuration provides the highest SAW amplitude, which is important while measuring the diffuse acoustic field. Nevertheless, the third one was particularly efficient in terms of reducing the contact area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.