ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Semi-Supervised Burn Depth Segmentation Network with Contrast Learning and Uncertainty Correction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactive AI assisted pediatric burn assessment based on smartphone images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Burn Assessment: A Scoping Review with a Large Language Model-Generated Decision Tree.European burn journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn injuries are a common traumatic condition, and the early diagnosis of burn depth is crucial for reducing treatment costs and improving survival rates. In recent years, image-based deep learning techniques have been utilized to realize the automation and standardization of burn depth segmentation. However, the scarcity and difficulty in labeling burn data limit the performance of traditional deep learning-based segmentation methods. Mainstream semi-supervised methods face challenges in burn depth segmentation due to single-level perturbations, lack of explicit edge modeling, and ineffective handling of inaccurate predictions in unlabeled data. To address these issues, we propose SBCU-Net, a semi-supervised burn depth segmentation network with contrastive learning and uncertainty correction. Building on the LTB-Net from our previous work, SBCU-Net introduces two additional decoder branches to enhance the consistency between the probability map and soft pseudo-labels under multi-level perturbations. To improve segmentation in complex regions like burn edges, contrastive learning refines the outputs of the three-branch decoder, enabling more discriminative feature representation learning. In addition, an uncertainty correction mechanism weights the consistency loss based on prediction uncertainty, reducing the impact of inaccurate pseudo-labels. Extensive experiments on burn datasets demonstrate that SBCU-Net effectively leverages unlabeled data and achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.