ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Frequency Response and Material Property Sensitivity Analysis of Moving-Coil Geophone Using Finite Element Simulation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the process of unconventional oil and gas production, a large number of microseismic signals are generated. These signals are received by geophones deployed on the ground or in wells and used for safety monitoring. The moving-coil geophone is a commonly used geophone, which is widely used for collecting vibration signals. However, the current conventional moving-coil geophones have certain limitations in terms of frequency band range and cannot fully meet the low-frequency requirements of microseismic signals. We studied the structure and material properties of moving-coil geophones to understand the factors that affect their frequency band. In this paper, we use finite element analysis method to perform structural analysis on a 10 Hz moving-coil geophone, and we combine modal analysis and excitation response analysis to obtain its operating frequency range of 10.63-200.68 Hz. We then discuss the effect of the vibrating components of a moving-coil geophone on its operating frequency range. The material properties of the spring sheet mainly affect the natural frequency of the first-order mode (natural frequency, the lower limit of the operating frequency of the geophone), and the material properties of the lead spring mainly affect the natural frequency of the second-order mode (spurious frequency, the upper limit of the operating frequency of the geophone). By analyzing the sensitivity of the material properties of the vibration system parts and selecting more suitable spring sheets and lead spring materials, a lower natural frequency and a higher spurious frequency can be obtained, thereby achieving the purpose of broadening the operating frequency range of the geophone, which is expected to provide help in actual production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.