ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Real Steps or Not: Auto-Walker Detection in Move-to-Earn Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In recent times, the emergence of Move-to-Earn (M2E) applications has revolutionized the intersection of digital innovation and physical wellness. Unlike their predecessors in the Play-to-Earn (P2E) domain, M2E apps incentivize physical activity, offering rewards for real-world movement such as walking or running. This shift aligns with a growing global focus on health consciousness that is propelled by the widespread adoption of smartphones and an increased awareness of the benefits of maintaining an active lifestyle. However, the rising popularity of these platforms has also brought about new problematic activities, with some users exploiting additional automated devices to simulate physical activity and claim rewards. In response, we propose an AI-based method aimed at distinguishing genuine user engagement from artificially generated auto-walker activity to ensure the integrity of reward distributions in M2E platforms. To demonstrate the generalizability of our model, we use a total of six open gait datasets and auto-walker datasets of automatic walking devices measured with various smartphones. Under unbiased and transparent evaluation, our model shows its ability to effectively discriminate auto-walker and genuine gait data not only on the seen datasets but also on the unseen datasets; it attained an F1-score of 0.997 on the auto-walker datasets and an F1-score of 1.000 on the genuine datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.