ArticlePolymers2025
Predicting Stress-Strain Curve with Confidence: Balance Between Data Minimization and Uncertainty Quantification by a Dual Bayesian Model.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individualized Prediction of In-Plane Shear Stress-Strain Curves for Composites Using Early-Stage Digital Image Correlation Strain Fields.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microstructural and Thermo-Optical Properties of Cassava and Gellan Gum Films: A Photoacoustic Study.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Driven by polymer processing-property data, machine learning (ML) presents an efficient paradigm in predicting the stress-strain curve. However, it is generally challenged by (i) the deficiency of training data, (ii) the one-to-many issue of processing-property relationship (i.e., aleatoric uncertainty), and (iii) the unawareness of model uncertainty (i.e., epistemic uncertainty). Here, leveraging a Bayesian neural network (BNN) and a recently proposed dual-architected model for curve prediction, we introduce a dual Bayesian model that enables accurate prediction of the stress-strain curve while distinguishing between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty at each processing condition. The model is trained using a Taguchi array dataset that minimizes the data size while maximizing the representativeness of 27 samples in a 4D processing parameter space, significantly reducing data requirements. By incorporating hidden layers and output-distribution layers, the model quantifies both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, aligning with experimental data fluctuations, and provides a 95% confidence interval for stress-strain predictions at each processing condition. Overall, this study establishes an uncertainty-aware framework for curve property prediction with reliable, modest uncertainty at a small data size, thus balancing data minimization and uncertainty quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.