Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006161›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Boosting-Based Machine Learning Applications in Polymer Science: A Review.

Ivan Malashin, Vadim Tynchenko, Andrei Gantimurov, Vladimir Nelyub, Aleksei Borodulin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivan MalashinArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0008-8986-402X
Vadim TynchenkoArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3959-2969
Andrei GantimurovArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0001-4246-9742
Vladimir NelyubArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4263-2367
Aleksei BorodulinArtificial Intelligence Technology Scientific and Education Center, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9648-2395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing complexity of polymer systems in both experimental and computational studies has led to an expanding interest in machine learning (ML) methods to aid in data analysis, material design, and predictive modeling. Among the various ML approaches, boosting methods, including AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, CatBoost and LightGBM, have emerged as powerful tools for tackling high-dimensional and complex problems in polymer science. This paper provides an overview of the applications of boosting methods in polymer science, highlighting their contributions to areas such as structure-property relationships, polymer synthesis, performance prediction, and material characterization. By examining recent case studies on the applications of boosting techniques in polymer science, this review aims to highlight their potential for advancing the design, characterization, and optimization of polymer materials.

Indexed as

AdaBoostboosting methodsCatBoostGradient BoostingLightGBMmachine learningpolymer scienceXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40006161
PMCPMC11859903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.