ArticlePolymers2025
Research on the Quality of Composite Pipe Components in Fluid-Powered Projectile-Assisted Injection Molding.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Composite pipe fittings with an outer layer of 20% long glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene (LGFR-PP) and an inner layer of polypropylene (PP) were prepared via water-powered projectile-assisted co-injection molding short-shot (W-PACIM-S), water-powered projectile-assisted co-injection molding overflow (W-PACIM-O), gas-powered projectile-assisted co-injection molding short-shot (G-PACIM-S), and gas-powered projectile-assisted co-injection molding overflow (G-PACIM-O)techniques. The effects of different injection molding processes on the wall thickness, inner surface roughness, glass fiber orientation, and pressure resistance of pipe fittings were studied to evaluate the quality of the pipe fittings formed by each process. Compared with the short-shot method, the overflow method results in pipes with thinner walls in each layer, a more uniform distribution, smoother inner wall surfaces, and better orientation of glass fibers along the axial direction in the near boundary layer, resulting in better pressure resistance. Under the same injection method, the difference in fluid medium did not significantly change the trend of wall thickness variation in each layer. However, compared with gas, high-pressure water improves the uniformity of the pipe wall thickness and inner wall quality. In addition, the introduction of the warhead is more conducive to improving the degree of glass fiber orientation of the pipe fittings, and the thickness of the residual wall thickness of the pipe fittings has a great influence on the pressure resistance of the pipe fittings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.