ArticlePolymers2025
Optimization of Bio-Based Polyurethane Elastic Nanofibrous Membrane via Electrospinning for Waterproof and Breathable Applications.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biocompatible Electrospun Biomaterials for Advancing Thermoregulating Wearable Sensors in Next-Generation Smart Textiles.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bio-based polyurethane (BPU) offers excellent biocompatibility and outstanding elasticity, providing vast potential for the development of next-generation waterproof and breathable materials. However, achieving stable and uniform electrospinning of BPU remains a significant challenge. Herein, BPU with superior electrospinning performance was synthesized using poly(butylene sebacate), poly(trimethylene ether glycol), ethylene glycol, and methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) as raw materials. BPU nanofibrous membranes were successfully fabricated using solutions of varying concentrations (12 wt%, 16 wt%, 20 wt%, and 24 wt%), and their morphology, mechanical properties, hydrophobicity, and breathability were systematically analyzed. The nanofibrous membrane prepared with 20 wt% BPU solution exhibited optimal fiber morphology and mechanical properties, with a tensile strength of 15.6 MPa and an elongation at break of 440.8%. In contrast, lower concentrations (12 wt% and 16 wt%) resulted in insufficient fiber formation, leading to poorer performance, while higher concentrations (24 wt%) significantly reduced fiber uniformity, negatively impacting the overall performance. Additionally, the nanofibrous membrane produced from the 20 wt% BPU solution demonstrated significant hydrophobicity and breathability, with a water contact angle of 133.2°, hydrostatic pressure of 48.2 kPa, and breathability of 12.6 kg·m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.