ArticlePolymers2025
Technical Advancements and Applications in Predictive Modeling of Polyurethane Foaming Height.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of a Highly Stable Water-Based Release Agent via 1:1 Silicone Oil-Cyclotetrasiloxane Synergy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various polyurethane foams (i.e., rigid, flexible, and spray polyurethane foams) offer diverse applications due to their unique properties, including thermal insulation, cushioning, and seamless gap filling. These foams provide solutions across industries such as construction, automotive, and refrigeration. However, the foaming process presents several challenges that may result in various defects in the final products. This work provides innovative predictive techniques for polyurethane foam expansion and applications in advanced manufacturing processes. The foaming height of the third polyurethane foaming agent (PU-3) closely aligned with the experimentally measured values. The relationship between foaming height and time is influenced by the type and concentration of catalysts, as well as the blowing agents used. However, simulations using Moldex 3D Version 2024 revealed a nonlinear relationship between foaming height and time, characterized by three distinct foaming rates. Zone B demonstrated the highest foaming rate, followed by Zone C, while Zone A showed the lowest rate. The foaming height and rate were significantly influenced by the foaming angle, with smaller angles enhancing both parameters. At a mold temperature of 30 °C and with an expansion coefficient of 35, the predicted foaming height of the polyurethane agent achieved an average accuracy of approximately 96% across four foaming angles. Based on these experimental findings, this study introduces three mechanisms involved in the foaming process of polyurethane foam components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.