Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006113›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Study of Construction of Innovative Barite/Waterborne Polyurethane/Low-Density Polyethylene Composites for Enhanced X-Ray Shielding Performance.

Xi Xu, Shujin Shi, Xianrong Yang, Huan Shuai, Gaoxiang Du, Jiao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xi XuSchool of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Shujin ShiSchool of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Xianrong YangSchool of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Huan ShuaiSchool of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-2681
Gaoxiang DuSchool of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0009-0002-1851-9858
Jiao WangSchool of Basic Education, Beijing Polytechnic College, Beijing 100042, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-rays' high-energy nature poses risks to human health. Traditional X-ray shielding materials often contain toxic lead and have drawbacks like bulkiness and rigidity. Consequently, there is an increasing need to develop lightweight, non-toxic, flexible, and efficient shielding materials. In this study, we modified barite with waterborne polyurethane (WPU) and systematically investigated the effects of WPU on barite's properties. The modification with WPU not only reduced the tendency of barite (B) to agglomerate but also enhanced its compatibility with polymers, thereby significantly improving the mechanical properties of LDPE/WPU-B composites. Compared to unmodified barite in LDPE/B composites, the tensile and flexural modulus of the LDPE/WPU-B composites increased by 22.31% and 29.64%, respectively. With 20% WPU-modified barite, the radiation shielding efficiency increased by 5%. When the WPU-B content reached 40%, the shielding efficiency of the LDPE/WPU-B composite exceeded 90% for tube voltages ranging from 60 kV to 120 kV, achieving a lead equivalent of 0.38 mmPb at 100 kV. This novel LDPE/WPU-B composite has great potential for low-dose radiation shielding applications.

Indexed as

baritecompatibilitymodificationwaterborne polyurethaneX-ray shielding

Identifiers

PMID40006113
PMCPMC11858836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.