ArticlePolymers2025
Effects of Infill Patterns on the Mechanical and Tribological Behaviour of 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid/Bamboo Biocomposites for Structural Applications.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Structure-Property-Performance Relationships in Thermoplastic Polyurethane: Influence of Infill Density and Surface Texture.Polymers · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Composite materials are gaining attention owing to their exemplary characteristics and, if the materials are eco-friendly, they attract much more. One such composite of poly lactic acid (PLA) combined with bamboo fiber in the ratio of 80:20 is selected for this study. The composites are manufactured using additive manufacturing, or the 3D-printing technique. In this article, a novel approach of infilling a honeycomb with around 12 infill patterns has been made, and all the 3D-printed specimens were tested for their mechanical and tribological properties. The 3D-printed composites were characterized using Fourier Transform InfraRed spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) to evaluate their chemical composition and crystallite size (CS), respectively. Based on the results, the cross infill pattern outperforms irregular geometries like the Gyroid in terms of impact strength owing to its efficient stress distribution and superior interlayer bonding. By utilizing bidirectional reinforcement and distributing loads uniformly, the grid infill was able to attain the Shore D maximum hardness due to its strong 3D lattice structure; the Octet infill is very resistant to wear, which improves energy absorption and decreases material loss. Such honeycomb-filled 3D-printed composites can act as high-mechanical-strength components and find their applications in aerospace applications like drones and their allied structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.