Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006063›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

General Anesthetics: Aspects of Chirality, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics.

Ružena Čižmáriková, Ladislav Habala, Jindra Valentová

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ružena ČižmárikováDepartment of Chemical Theory of Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Odbojárov 10, SK-833232 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Ladislav HabalaDepartment of Chemical Theory of Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Odbojárov 10, SK-833232 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Jindra ValentováDepartment of Chemical Theory of Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Odbojárov 10, SK-833232 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

Scientific Grant Agency of Slovak Republic VEGA 1/0661/24Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-23-0349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of general anesthetics in the mid-19th century is considered one of the greatest contributions to medical practice. It was the first time that complicated surgical interventions became feasible, without putting an excessive strain on the patient. The first general anesthetics-diethyl ether, chloroform, and nitrous oxide-were limited by often severe adverse reactions and a narrow therapeutic window. They were later succeeded by modern anesthetics, with high anesthetic effect along with diminished toxicity. As with other medical drugs, many anesthetic compounds contain chiral centers in their molecules. Although currently used as racemates, the pharmacological activity of the respective enantiomerically pure antipodes can vary considerably, as can their adverse effects. Herein, we report on the available studies into the differences in bioactivity and toxicity between the enantiomers of chiral anesthetic agents. Both inhalational and intravenous anesthetics are discussed. Aspects of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics are surveyed as well. The results could stimulate further research into the potential application of single-enantiomer anesthetics in clinical practice.

Indexed as

chiralityenantiomersgeneral anestheticsinhalational anestheticsintravenous anestheticspharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsstereochemistry

Identifiers

PMID40006063
PMCPMC11860141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.