ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Computational Modeling of Pharmaceuticals with an Emphasis on Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrated in Silico, in Vitro, and in Vivo Assessment of the Antioxidant and Neuroprotective Profile of Selenocyanate Compounds.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Penetrating potential evaluation of cyclotriphosphazenes target blood-brain barrier via computational toxicology methods.iScience · 2026Article
- Advances in Machine Learning-Enhanced PBPK Models for Brain-Targeted Drug Delivery via Nanocarriers: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Central toxic effects of an antitumoral bufadienolide: In silico targets and in vivo findings.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- From Xenobiotic Exposure to Neuroinflammation: Mechanisms Linking Lipopolysaccharide Signaling to Depressive-like Behavior.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of inflammatory response in secondary brain injury: a review of computational approaches, challenges, and future directions.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Review
- Natural Products in Epilepsy Treatment: From Traditional Medicine Towards Computational Drug Discovery.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Chemical Profile and Bioinsecticidal Nanoemulsion ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From fragmented neurotechnologies to closed-loop brain health systems: integrating artificial intelligence, digital health, digital twins, and advanced materials for brain disorders.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Informing development of brain cancer therapies within "preclinical trials" using ex vivo patient tumors.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026Review
- Investigating Amphoteric 3,4'-Biscoumarin-BasedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Next-generation cancer therapeutics: unveiling the potential of liposome-based nanoparticles through bioinformatics.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The discovery and development of new pharmaceutical drugs is a costly, time-consuming, and highly manual process, with significant challenges in ensuring drug bioavailability at target sites. Computational techniques are highly employed in drug design, particularly to predict the pharmacokinetic properties of molecules. One major kinetic challenge in central nervous system drug development is the permeation through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Several different computational techniques are used to evaluate both BBB permeability and target delivery. Methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationships, machine learning models, molecular dynamics simulations, end-point free energy calculations, or transporter models have pros and cons for drug development, all contributing to a better understanding of a specific characteristic. Additionally, the design (assisted or not by computers) of prodrug and nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems can enhance BBB permeability by leveraging enzymatic activation and transporter-mediated uptake. Neuroactive peptide computational development is also a relevant field in drug design, since biopharmaceuticals are on the edge of drug discovery. By integrating these computational and formulation-based strategies, researchers can enhance the rational design of BBB-permeable drugs while minimizing off-target effects. This review is valuable for understanding BBB selectivity principles and the latest in silico and nanotechnological approaches for improving CNS drug delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.