Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006031›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Computational Modeling of Pharmaceuticals with an Emphasis on Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier.

Patrícia Alencar Alves, Luana Cristina Camargo, Gabriel Mendonça de Souza, Márcia Renata Mortari, Mauricio Homem-de-Mello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Chemical Profile and Bioinsecticidal Nanoemulsion ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Investigating Amphoteric 3,4'-Biscoumarin-BasedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrícia Alencar AlvesIn Silico Toxicology Laboratory (inSiliTox), Department of Pharmacy, Health Sciences School, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 71910-900, Brazil.
Luana Cristina CamargoPsychobiology Laboratory, Department of Basic Psychological Processes, Institute of Psychology University of Brasilia, Brasilia 71910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-037X
Gabriel Mendonça de SouzaIn Silico Toxicology Laboratory (inSiliTox), Department of Pharmacy, Health Sciences School, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 71910-900, Brazil.
Márcia Renata MortariNeuropharmacology Laboratory, Department of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 71910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6849-6001
Mauricio Homem-de-MelloIn Silico Toxicology Laboratory (inSiliTox), Department of Pharmacy, Health Sciences School, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 71910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4541-9177

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Foundation for Research Support of the Federal District 00193-0000001859/2023-84 (L.C.C)Foundation for Research Support of the Federal District 00193-00001265/2021-10 (M.R.M.)Foundation for Research Support of the Federal District 39828.204.31613.06052024 (M.H.-d.-M)National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 309671/2023-0 (M.R.M.)National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 403543/2021-5 (M.R.M.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery and development of new pharmaceutical drugs is a costly, time-consuming, and highly manual process, with significant challenges in ensuring drug bioavailability at target sites. Computational techniques are highly employed in drug design, particularly to predict the pharmacokinetic properties of molecules. One major kinetic challenge in central nervous system drug development is the permeation through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Several different computational techniques are used to evaluate both BBB permeability and target delivery. Methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationships, machine learning models, molecular dynamics simulations, end-point free energy calculations, or transporter models have pros and cons for drug development, all contributing to a better understanding of a specific characteristic. Additionally, the design (assisted or not by computers) of prodrug and nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems can enhance BBB permeability by leveraging enzymatic activation and transporter-mediated uptake. Neuroactive peptide computational development is also a relevant field in drug design, since biopharmaceuticals are on the edge of drug discovery. By integrating these computational and formulation-based strategies, researchers can enhance the rational design of BBB-permeable drugs while minimizing off-target effects. This review is valuable for understanding BBB selectivity principles and the latest in silico and nanotechnological approaches for improving CNS drug delivery.

Indexed as

blood–brain barriercentral nervous system drugsCNS-targeted nanoparticlesend-point free energyin silico drug designmachine learningmembrane transportersmolecular dockingmolecular dynamicsneuroactive peptidesprodrug designquantitative structure–activity relationship

Identifiers

PMID40006031
PMCPMC11860133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.