Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40005923›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2025

Current Tick Control Strategies and Prospects for Using Nanotechnology as an Efficient Alternative-A Review.

Rafaela Regina Fantatto, João Vitor Carvalho Constantini, Flávio Augusto Sanches Politi, Rodrigo Sorrechia, Camila Cristina Baccetti Medeiros, Marcela Tavares Luiz, Gervásio Henrique Bechara, Ana Carolina de Souza Chagas, Marlus Chorilli, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues Pietro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rafaela Regina FantattoDepartament of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University UNESP, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú Km 1, Araraquara 14800-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2031-7801
João Vitor Carvalho ConstantiniDepartament of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University UNESP, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú Km 1, Araraquara 14800-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9814-6961
Flávio Augusto Sanches PolitiDepartament of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University UNESP, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú Km 1, Araraquara 14800-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-5509
Rodrigo SorrechiaDepartament of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University UNESP, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú Km 1, Araraquara 14800-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0920-7580
Camila Cristina Baccetti MedeirosDepartament of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University UNESP, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú Km 1, Araraquara 14800-903, SP, Brazil.
Marcela Tavares LuizDepartament of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University UNESP, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú Km 1, Araraquara 14800-903, SP, Brazil.
Gervásio Henrique BecharaGraduate Program in Animal Science-PPGCA, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Rua Imaculada Conceição, Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.
Ana Carolina de Souza ChagasSoutheast Livestock Unit, EMBRAPA-Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Rodovia Washington Luiz, Km 234, São Carlos 13560-970, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3939-0088
Marlus ChorilliDepartament of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University UNESP, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú Km 1, Araraquara 14800-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6698-0545
Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues PietroDepartament of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University UNESP, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú Km 1, Araraquara 14800-903, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7859-8127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks pose significant challenges to public and veterinary health, acting as vectors of several diseases that affect animals and humans. Traditional chemical control methods, such as pyrethroids and organophosphates, have led to increasing resistance and environmental contamination, highlighting the need and urgency for alternative strategies. This review explores contemporary approaches to tick control, emphasizing plant-derived acaricides and their integration with nanotechnology. Plant extracts, known for their acaricidal properties, disrupt several biological processes in ticks, reducing reproduction and survival rates. The advent of nanotechnology offers promising advances in increasing the efficacy of these natural extracts. Nanoparticles add properties to the systems where they act by improving the stability, bioavailability, and targeted delivery of plant-derived compounds, potentially overcoming the limitations of traditional acaricides. This synthesis of current knowledge highlights the potential of combining plant extracts with nanotechnology to develop sustainable and effective tick control solutions, addressing issues of acaricide resistance as well as environmental concerns. The review also identifies research gaps and suggests directions for future studies to optimize the application of nanotechnology in tick management.

Indexed as

acaricidesenvironmental impactnanotechnologyplant extractsresistance managementtick control

Identifiers

PMID40005923
PMCPMC11860588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.