ReviewMicroorganisms2025
Antimicrobial Lock Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review.
Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of different antibiotic lock solutions on catheter-related infections of hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Antibiotic lock therapy for catheter-related bloodstream infections in pediatric hemato-oncology: a retrospective analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Meropenem-Heparin Lock Therapy for Ochrobactrum intermedium Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in a Pediatric Hemodialysis Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2026Review
- Sodium bicarbonate combined with urokinase for the prevention and management of hemodialysis central venous catheter dysfunction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- The Efficiency of Taurolidine Lock Solution in Preventing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Children with Intestinal Failure.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Synergistic Activity of Vancomycin and Gentamicin AgainstMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Lock Therapy: A Strategy for Managing Catheter-Related Bacteremia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial lock therapy (ALT) prevents microbial colonization in central vein catheters and treats existing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs); the ALT assessment involves several key considerations. First, identifying which patients are suitable candidates is crucial. Additionally, understanding the clinical contexts in which is utilised provides insight into its applications. Examining when ALT has been employed and analyzing trends in its use over time can highlight its evolving role in patient care. Equally important is understanding how ALT is administered, including the specific agents used. Lastly, determining whether there is sufficient existing literature is essential to evaluate the feasibility of conducting future systematic reviews. This study is a scoping review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and followed a five-stage methodological framework. Of the 1024 studies identified, 336 were included in the analysis. Findings highlight the widespread use of ethanol and taurolidine for CRBSIs prevention and the concurrent use of ALT with systemic antimicrobials to treat CRBSIs without catheter removal. ALT improves clinical outcomes, including post-infection survival and catheter retention. From our analysis, we have concluded that both an umbrella review of systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis comparing lock solutions can provide clearer guidance for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.