Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40005772›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

Antimicrobial Lock Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review.

Aniello Alfieri, Sveva Di Franco, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace, Vittorio Simeon, Paolo Chiodini, Sebastiano Leone, Marco Fiore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aniello AlfieriDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1330-5968
Sveva Di FrancoDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-2677
Maria Beatrice PassavantiDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Maria Caterina PaceDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Vittorio SimeonMedical Statistics Unit, Department of Public, Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2387-4125
Paolo ChiodiniMedical Statistics Unit, Department of Public, Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0139-2264
Sebastiano LeoneDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Contrada Amoretta, 83100 Avellino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7852-4101
Marco FioreDepartment of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7263-0229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial lock therapy (ALT) prevents microbial colonization in central vein catheters and treats existing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs); the ALT assessment involves several key considerations. First, identifying which patients are suitable candidates is crucial. Additionally, understanding the clinical contexts in which is utilised provides insight into its applications. Examining when ALT has been employed and analyzing trends in its use over time can highlight its evolving role in patient care. Equally important is understanding how ALT is administered, including the specific agents used. Lastly, determining whether there is sufficient existing literature is essential to evaluate the feasibility of conducting future systematic reviews. This study is a scoping review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and followed a five-stage methodological framework. Of the 1024 studies identified, 336 were included in the analysis. Findings highlight the widespread use of ethanol and taurolidine for CRBSIs prevention and the concurrent use of ALT with systemic antimicrobials to treat CRBSIs without catheter removal. ALT improves clinical outcomes, including post-infection survival and catheter retention. From our analysis, we have concluded that both an umbrella review of systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis comparing lock solutions can provide clearer guidance for clinical practice.

Indexed as

ALTantimicrobial lock therapycentral venous catheterscontinuous quality improvementCRBSIsnosocomial infectionscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40005772
PMCPMC11857916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.