ArticleMicroorganisms2025
The Microbiome of Catfish (
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fish is an essential lean protein source worldwide. Unfortunately, fresh fish food products deteriorate rapidly due to microbial spoilage. With consumers' growing concerns about using chemical preservatives, we propose using natural preservatives as safer alternatives to prevent microbial spoilage. In this study, we used Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) metagenomics to study microbiomes on catfish fillets at early (day one for all samples), middle (day seven for control store-bought and aquaculture-raised samples, day nine for other treatment store-bought samples, and day eleven for other treatment aquaculture-raised samples), and late (day fifteen for all store-bought, day eleven for control aquaculture-raised samples, and day twenty-seven for other treatment aquaculture-raised samples) points. Store-bought and aquaculture-raised catfish were treated individually with natural preservatives (vinegar, lemon, and grapefruit seed [GSE]). We observed bacterial populations and sequenced 16S NGS libraries of catfish microbes. Vinegar treatment showed the greatest suppression of bacterial growth in both groups, and GSE and lemon treatment had similar levels of suppression in the mid and late points (-4 to -5 Log CFU/g vinegar and -0.1 to -4 Log CFU/g other treatments in aquaculture and -1 to -2 Log CFU/g vinegar and -0.2 to -0.5 Log CFU/g other treatments in store-bought). Aquaculture-raised vinegar treatment samples had similar proportional taxonomy abundance values through storage duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.