ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Canine Adenoviruses in Wildlife: Role in At-Risk Species Conservation and Interface with Domestic Animals.
Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular detection of shared pathogens in red foxes (One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Preliminary Screening for Selected Viral Pathogens in Red Fox Carcasses from Pisa Province, Italy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fatal multidrug-resistant Bordetella bronchiseptica and CAdV-2 coinfection in an 8-month-old boxer puppy, Southern Italy.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Molecular detection and pathological evaluation of canine adenovirus 1 in Indian bear species.Archives of virology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canine adenovirus type 1 (CAdV-1) and type 2 (CAdV-2) are well known pathogens of domestic dogs but are little investigated in wild animals. The few available studies about CAdV-1 in wild animals show that it circulates in various species and that transmission of the virus in the interface between wildlife and domestic animals is a frequent event. Furthermore, wild animals are usually subject to asymptomatic infections, but cases of serious and fatal diseases have been documented, with possible effects on the conservation of the species. In contrast, CAdV-2 infection was reported only recently and sporadically in some wild animals, with few data regarding its pathogenic role in these species. However, the real prevalence of these viruses in wildlife is still uncertain due to the use of serological tests that are largely unable to distinguish antibodies against CAdV-1 and CAdV-2. This review, reporting all the data currently available on CAdV-1 and CAdV-2 infection in wild animals, highlights the importance of these pathogens for wildlife conservation and their role in the potential transmission of the infection to domestic dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.