Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40005543›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination Antibiotics Under Development.

Angeliki Katsarou, Panagiotis Stathopoulos, Iva D Tzvetanova, Christina-Maria Asimotou, Matthew E Falagas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of data on the resistance of uropathogens to sulopenem.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Treatment Options for Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-ProducingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Treating Extensively Drug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotic Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  20. A Review ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angeliki KatsarouAlfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis StathopoulosAlfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Athens, Greece.
Iva D TzvetanovaSchool of Medicine, European University Cyprus, 6 Diogenous Street, 2404 Nicosia, Cyprus.
Christina-Maria AsimotouAlfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Athens, Greece.
Matthew E FalagasAlfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), 9 Neapoleos Street, 151 23 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance remains a public health problem of global concern with a great health and financial burden. Its recognition as a threat by political leadership has boosted the research and development of new antibiotics and particularly novel combinations of β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, which remain the major concern in clinical practice. The incorporation of ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam has provided new therapeutic options in the treatment of patients with infections due to MDR pathogens. Cefiderocol along with cefepime/enmetazobactam, avibactam/aztreonam, and sulbactam/durlobactam have been recently added to these agents as therapeutic choices, particularly for metallo-β-lactamase producing Gram-negative bacteria. Currently, many combinations are being studied for their in vitro activity against both serine- and metallo-β-lactamases. However, only a few have advanced through phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials. Among them, in this article, we focus on the most promising combinations of cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, and imipenem/cilastatin/funobactam, which are currently under investigation in phase 3 trials.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsDrug CombinationsDrug DevelopmentDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamsDrug Combinationsantimicrobial resistancecefepime/taniborbactamcefepime/zidebactamimipenem/cilastatin/funobactammeropenem/nacubactammetallo-β-lactamasesxeruborbactam/β-lactamsβ-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40005543
PMCPMC11858600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.