Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40005496›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of the Dose of African Swine Fever Virus Required to Establish Infection in Pigs Following Oral Uptake.

Ann Sofie Olesen, Christina Marie Lazov, Francesc Accensi, Camille Melissa Johnston, Thomas Bruun Rasmussen, Anette Bøtner, Louise Lohse, Graham J Belsham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ann Sofie OlesenSection for Veterinary Virology, Department of Virus & Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6161-3439
Christina Marie LazovSection for Veterinary Virology, Department of Virus & Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2852-970X
Francesc AccensiResearch Combined Unit IRTA-UAB in Animal Health, Research Center in Animal Health (Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal CReSA), Campus of Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Camille Melissa JohnstonSection for Veterinary Virology, Department of Virus & Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1550-2666
Thomas Bruun RasmussenSection for Veterinary Virology, Department of Virus & Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4241-1559
Anette BøtnerSection for Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Louise LohseSection for Veterinary Virology, Department of Virus & Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6769-5447
Graham J BelshamSection for Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1187-4873

Funding

Ministeriet for Fø devarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri NAStatens Serum Institut NAUniversity of Copenhagen NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is known to be very stable within a protein-rich environment and indirect virus transmission can be mediated via oral uptake of different materials. However, experimental studies in pigs have shown that infection by ASFV via the oral route can be difficult to establish. Currently, there is a lack of studies using strict oral inoculations of pigs with different doses of ASFV. Therefore, we aimed to determine the dose of a European genotype II ASFV that is required to establish infection of pigs by the oral route. In this study, 24 pigs were divided into four groups of six. Three of the groups were fed with a low, medium or high dose of the ASFV POL/2015/Podlaskie virus. The pigs in the fourth group served as positive controls and were inoculated intranasally, just once, using the low dose of the virus. All the pigs inoculated intranasally with ASFV succumbed to the infection, while only three of the six pigs that were fed the high dose of the virus became infected. None of the 12 pigs that were fed with either the medium or low dose of the virus became infected, despite receiving up to thirteen doses each. In two of the pigs infected by intranasal inoculation, the presence of a variant form of the ASFV genome was detected. The results obtained in this study underline that ASFV infection is more difficult to establish via the oral route when compared to the intranasal route. The high dose needed in order to establish oral infection could have implications for future strategies using baited vaccines containing infectious live-attenuated ASFV.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAdministration, OralAnimalsSwineASFVdosing studyfeedingoral uptaketransmission

Identifiers

PMID40005496
PMCPMC11857857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.