Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40005304›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

Neuromuscular Response to High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Spinal Manipulation-An Overview.

Murdi S Alanazi, Brian Degenhardt, Gwyn Kelley-Franklin, James M Cox, Laura Lipke, William R Reed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Murdi S AlanaziRehabilitation Science Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-9583-6432
Brian DegenhardtA.T. Still Research Institute, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA.
Gwyn Kelley-FranklinA.T. Still Research Institute, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7734-4309
James M CoxIndependent Researcher, Private Practice, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, USA.
Laura LipkeA.T. Still Research Institute, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3653-5843
William R ReedDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4580-485X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical use of spinal manipulation to treat musculoskeletal conditions has nearly tripled in the United States since 1980, and it is currently recommended by most global clinical guidelines as a conservative treatment for musculoskeletal pain, despite a lack of knowledge concerning its mechanisms of action. This overview highlights evidence of direct neuromuscular responses to high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) as delivered by chiropractic, osteopathic, and physical therapy clinicians, with an intent to foster greater interprofessional dialogue and collaborative research to better address current gaps in mechanistic knowledge of the neuromuscular response to HVLA-SM. Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCO), EMBASE (Elsevier)) were searched from 2000 to December 2024 with specific search terms related to thrust HVLA-SM and the neuromuscular response. To focus strictly on neuromuscular responses related to HVLA-SM, this literature overview excluded articles using non-HVLA-SM manual therapy techniques (i.e., massage, non-thrust joint mobilization, and/or combined HVLA-SM with other forms of treatment such as exercise or non-thrust joint mobilization) and studies in which patient-centered outcomes (i.e., pain scores) were the primary outcomes of the HVLA-SM interventions. Pediatric studies, animal studies, and studies in languages other than English were also excluded. One-hundred and thirty six articles were identified and included in this overview. Neuromuscular findings related to HVLA-SM in the areas of electromyography (EMG), muscle thickness, muscle strength, reflexes, electroencephalogram (EEG), and evoked potential were often mixed; however, evidence is beginning to accumulate either in favor of or opposed to particular neuromuscular responses to HVLA-SM as larger and more scientifically rigorous studies are being performed. Recurrent limitations of many HVLA-SM-related studies are small sample sizes, leading to a lack of generalizability, and the non-standardization of HVLA-SM delivery, which has prevented researchers from arriving at definitive conclusions regarding neuromuscular responses to HVLA-SM. Discussions of future neuromuscular research needs related to HVLA-SM are included for clinicians and researchers inside and outside of the field of manual therapy, to advance this field.

Indexed as

Manipulation, SpinalHumanselectromyographyhigh-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulationmanual therapyneuromuscularspinal manipulation

Identifiers

PMID40005304
PMCPMC11857552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.