Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40005191›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Beef Traceability Between China and Argentina Based on Various Machine Learning Models.

Xiaomeng Xiang, Chaomin Zhao, Runhe Zhang, Jing Zeng, Liangzi Wang, Shuran Zhang, Diego Cristos, Bing Liu, Siyan Xu, Xionghai Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaomeng XiangResearch Institute for Doping Control, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0009-0006-6930-5808
Chaomin ZhaoTechnical Center for Animal, Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai 201210, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7062-9045
Runhe ZhangTechnical Center for Animal, Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai 201210, China.
Jing ZengTechnical Center for Animal, Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai 201210, China.
Liangzi WangTechnical Center for Animal, Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai 201210, China.
Shuran ZhangTechnical Center for Animal, Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai 201210, China.
Diego CristosFood Technology Institute-Agroindustry Research Center, Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Bing LiuResearch Institute for Doping Control, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6337-3774
Siyan XuResearch Institute for Doping Control, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xionghai YiTechnical Center for Animal, Plant and Food Inspection and Quarantine, Shanghai Customs, Shanghai 201210, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beef, as a nutrient-rich food, is widely favored by consumers. The production region significantly influences the nutritional value and quality of beef. However, current methods for tracing the origin of beef are still under development, necessitating effective approaches to ensure food safety and meet consumer demand for high-quality beef. This study aims to establish a classification model for beef origin prediction by analyzing elemental content and stable isotopes in beef samples from two countries. The concentrations of elements in beef were analyzed using ICP-MS and ICP-OES, while the stable carbon isotope ratio was determined using EA-IRMS. Machine learning algorithms were employed to construct classification prediction models. A total of 83 beef samples were analyzed for the concentrations of 52 elements and the stable carbon isotope ratio. The classification accuracy of the PLS-DA model built on these results was 98.8%, while the prediction accuracy was 94.12% for the convolutional neural network (CNN) and 82.35% for the Random Forest algorithm. The PLS-DA model demonstrated higher classification accuracy compared to CNN and Random Forest, with an explanatory power (R

Indexed as

Machine LearningRed MeatAlgorithmsAnimalsArgentinaCarbon IsotopesCattleChinaNeural Networks, ComputerCarbon Isotopesbeef traceabilityclassification modelelemental analysismachine learningstable isotope ratio

Identifiers

PMID40005191
PMCPMC11858054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.