ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sensory Evaluation of Effervescent Nutritional Supplements: Identification and Characterisation of Off-Tastes.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensory Acceptability and Sensory Profiles of Flavoured Foods for Special Medical Purposes: A Quantitative Descriptive Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are often characterised by unpleasant tastes or aftertastes, primarily due to the presence of vitamins, minerals, and amino acids as active compounds. These taste defects can be masked by sweeteners or specific flavourings. However, the development of such strategies requires a thorough understanding of the sensory characteristics of nutritional supplements. In the present study, the sensory properties of four effervescent nutritional supplements, differing in composition, were evaluated using Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) across three modalities: orthonasal and retronasal odour perception, as well as aftertaste and aroma persistence. Bitterness, astringency, and metallic sensations were found to be responsible for the negative sensory attributes of the products in solution. The addition of flavouring agents was found to have either a positive or negative effect on the taste characteristics of the supplements. Indeed, certain fruity notes enhanced sweet and sour sensations and were found to mask negative sensory perceptions, although this effect varied depending both on the nature of the nutritional supplement and on the QDA modalities, mainly due to the oral process progressing. A better understanding of these perceptual interactions could provide a solution for masking strategies, potentially reducing the use of additives that can be expensive and detrimental to health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.