Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004990›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2025

Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on the Consumption of Different Food Groups and the Risk of Overweight and Obesity.

Emilie Kristoffersen, Sofie Lassen Hjort, Lise M Thomassen, Elaheh Javadi Arjmand, Matteo Perillo, Rajiv Balakrishna, Anindita Tasnim Onni, Ida Sofie Karlsen Sletten, Antonello Lorenzini, Lars T Fadnes

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emilie KristoffersenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Sofie Lassen HjortDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Lise M ThomassenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0009-0005-0680-2076
Elaheh Javadi ArjmandDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1264-6736
Matteo PerilloDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8778-6258
Rajiv BalakrishnaDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Anindita Tasnim OnniDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Ida Sofie Karlsen SlettenMedical Faculty, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2186-5041
Antonello LorenziniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9615-9697
Lars T FadnesDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8757-2092

Funding

Foundation Dam SDAM_FOR462258Italian Ministry of University and Research in the framework of PNC "DARE - Digital lifelong prevention project PNC0000002 - CUP B53C22006450001Western Norway Reginal Healthy Authority ATLAS4LAR-project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesDietary choices play an essential role in energy balance and weight gain. This systematic umbrella review investigates the association between the intake of various food groups (whole grains, refined grains, fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, eggs, total dairy, red meat, white meat, processed meat, added sugar, and sugar-sweetened beverages) and their associations to the risk of obesity and being overweight.

methodsWe systematically searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Epistemonikos for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A total of 2925 articles were screened, and 13 articles were included in our analysis.

resultsFor each food group, data included a mean of 166,100 participants and 36,760 cases, ranging from 19,885 participants and 7183 cases for red meat to 520,331 participants and 91,256 cases for nuts. Heterogeneity was high for most of the food groups except for whole grains and sugar-sweetened beverages. The quality of the most comprehensive meta-analyses was high for all food groups, except for processed meats, which was of low quality. High intakes of whole grains, legumes, nuts, and fruits are associated with a reduced risk of overweight and obesity. In contrast, high intakes of red meat and sugar-sweetened beverages are associated with increased risk of overweight and obesity. No significant results were found for the remaining food groups, and no meta-analysis was found for fish, eggs, white meat, and added sugars.

conclusionsDiets rich in whole grains, legumes, nuts, and fruits are associated with a lower risk of developing obesity and being overweight. In contrast, diets high in red meat and sugar-sweetened beverages are associated with an increased risk of overweight and obesity.

Indexed as

DietObesityOverweightFruitHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRisk FactorsSystematic Reviews as Topicdietdietary patternfoodfood groupsnutritionobesityoverweightumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID40004990
PMCPMC11857968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.