Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004925›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Benefits and Pitfalls of Uraemic Toxin Measurement in Peritoneal Dialysis.

Aruni Malaweera, Louis Huang, Lawrence McMahon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aruni MalaweeraDepartment of Renal Medicine, Eastern Health, 5, Arnold Street, Box Hill, Melbourne, VIC 3128, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2807-2420
Louis HuangDepartment of Renal Medicine, Eastern Health, 5, Arnold Street, Box Hill, Melbourne, VIC 3128, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4883-420X
Lawrence McMahonDepartment of Renal Medicine, Eastern Health, 5, Arnold Street, Box Hill, Melbourne, VIC 3128, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3204-6444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease is a global health burden with a rising incidence and prevalence in developed and developing nations. Once established, it results in a progressive accumulation of a myriad of uraemic toxins. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) uses the body's peritoneal membrane to remove these toxins across a semipermeable membrane to restore and maintain homeostasis. Traditionally, dialysis adequacy has been measured through clearance of urea and creatinine. However, numerous studies have shown marginal links comparing the clearance of urea and creatinine with clinical outcomes reflected in the recent changes to the ISPD guidelines on dialysis adequacy. Instead, attention has focused on protein-bound uraemic toxins (PBTs). Produced by gut bacteria, these molecules are highly protein-bound and poorly removed by either dialysis or absorptive agents. Elevated concentrations of molecules such as p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate have been associated with abnormal cellular function and poor patient outcomes. However, widespread use of these measures to determine dialysis adequacy has been limited by the need for specialized techniques required for measurement. Altering the gut microbiome to reduce generation of PBTs through increased dietary fiber might be an alternate approach to better patient outcomes, with some initial positive reports. This report explores advantages and limitations of measuring uraemic toxins in PD, now and in the foreseeable future.

Indexed as

adequacycreatininefiberprotein-boundtoxinuraemicurea

Identifiers

PMID40004925
PMCPMC11857055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.