ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Spinal Cord Infarction: Clinical and Neuroradiological Clues of a Rare Stroke Subtype.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Thrombolysis in spinal cord infarction: Case report and systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Spinal cord infarction following neurointerventional procedures in the posterior cerebral circulation: a case analysis and systematic literature review.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Spinal cord imaging in multiple sclerosis: from diagnosis to disease progression.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Differentiating Weakness-an Atypical Presentation of Acute Neuromuscular Paralysis: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Hypotension-Induced Transverse Spinal Cord Ischemia.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord infarction (SCI) of arterial origin is a rare vascular event, and its incidence is probably underestimated. There are no strong epidemiological data, and the diagnostic pathway is complex and sometimes incomplete. Furthermore, many cases may be misdiagnosed as other forms of acute and subacute myelopathies. The focus of this review is the clinical and neuroradiological issues in diagnosing SCI and their respective reliability in a clinical setting. The new proposed diagnostic criteria of SCI, although not covering all aspects, highlight the need for a comprehensive approach, including even atypical cases, as the lack of cord compression on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the only mandatory feature for diagnosis. Some MRI features are supportive of the diagnosis, particularly when the anterior spinal artery territory is involved and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is used. Several etiologies can be considered, considering traditional vascular risk factors and diseases affecting the aorta and its main branches, yet a significant proportion of cases remain without a definite etiology. The strongest predictor of SCI diagnosis is a clinical variable, i.e., a time to nadir of severe deficits < 12 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.