Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004720›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Part 2-Cardiac Rehabilitation After an Acute Myocardial Infarction: Timing and Gender Differences in Adherence; Where Do We Stand?

Aneta Aleksova, Alessandra Lucia Fluca, Antonio Paolo Beltrami, Elena Dozio, Gianfranco Sinagra, Maria Marketou, Milijana Janjusevic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aneta AleksovaCardiothoracovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34100 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7711-9905
Alessandra Lucia FlucaCardiothoracovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34100 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6427-8093
Antonio Paolo BeltramiDipartimento di Area Medica (DAME), Istituto di Patologia Clinica, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0679-2710
Elena DozioDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5833-0780
Gianfranco SinagraCardiothoracovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34100 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2700-8478
Maria MarketouCardiology Department Crete, School of Medicine, Heraklion University General Hospital, University of Crete, 700 13 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1888-3430
Milijana JanjusevicCardiothoracovascular Department, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34100 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9579-1439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation is a beneficial multidisciplinary interventional protocol that improves cardiovascular health and reduces mortality and morbidity rates in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Multiple studies have demonstrated that the implementation of such protocols in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) dramatically improved patients' outcome. It is unfortunate that in practice, in spite of the advantages of cardiac rehabilitation, this approach is seldom employed. Indeed, only some guidance, such as American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology guidelines, recommends cardiac rehabilitation in their protocols. In particular, the European guideline recommends its early implementation while the patient is still in hospital, whereas the American guideline suggests that it should be approximately three weeks after discharge. In Part 1 of this two-part comprehensive review, we provided a historical overview of cardiac rehabilitation, a detailed examination of each component of the cardiac rehabilitation programme, and its impact on cardiovascular health. In Part 2, the objective was to provide a comprehensive explanation of the optimal timing for the commencement of the cardiac rehabilitation programme, and to elucidate the factors that influence low engagement in such programmes, as well as the gender-based differences in adherence.

Indexed as

adherencecardiac rehabilitationgender differenceillness perceptionmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID40004720
PMCPMC11856719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.