ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Clinical Outcomes of Machine Perfusion and Temperature Control Systems in Heart Transplantation: Where We Stand.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular and Molecular Changes Induced by Various Preservation Temperatures and Methods of Preservation in Renal Grafts and Other Solid Organ Grafts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cryopreservation Strategies to Improve Access to Organ Transplantation.Transplantation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart transplantation remains the preferred treatment for carefully selected patients with end-stage heart failure refractory to medical therapy. Advances in donor management, organ preservation, donor and recipient selection, immunosuppressive strategies, and mechanical circulatory support have significantly improved the safety and efficacy of heart transplantation. However, the persistent shortage of donor hearts and their limited preservation period continues to restrict access to this lifesaving procedure. The advent of innovative machine perfusion and temperature control systems for heart allograft preservation offers a promising avenue to address these challenges. These technologies aim to extend preservation times and enable the use of extended-criteria donors, thereby expanding the donor pool. In this review, we examine the outcomes from clinical trials, registry data, and single-center studies, utilizing the TransMedics Organ Care System Heart, Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System, and XVIVO Heart Preservation System. As the field of heart transplantation evolves to accommodate longer ischemia times, expand organ sharing, and utilize donors previously considered marginal, the integration of these advanced technologies will be essential for optimizing post-transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.