ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
A Systematic Review of Disappearing Colorectal Liver Metastases: Resection or No Resection?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Surgical treatment of metastatic liver cancer: the biological-behavioral basis of "homotherapy for heteropathy"].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Disappearing Colorectal Liver Metastases: Should the Treatment Sequence Be Reconsidered for Selected Lesions?Cancers · 2026Article
- Review
- Clinical Advances in Hepatobiliary Surgery: Diagnosis, Prognosis, Management and Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging in Assessing Nonviability of Disappearing Colorectal Liver Metastasis.JAMA surgery · 2025Article
- Prognostic model for early-onset colorectal cancer with liver metastasis after primary tumor resection and chemotherapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.