ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Surgical Stabilization of the Spine: A Clinical Review of Spinal Fractures, Spondylolisthesis, and Instrumentation Methods.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal and body composition effects of orchiectomy in a colony of diet-induced obese cynomolgus macaques.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Morphometric Analysis of Lumbar Vertebral Pedicles According to Age and Gender.Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2026Article
- PMMA-based composite bone cements with zirconium oxide fillers of different granulations: structural optimization and biofunctional potential.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Mechanical Properties and Functional Assessment of PMMA Bone Cements Modified with Glassy Carbon.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spine is a complex structure critical for stability, force transmission, and neural protection, with spinal fractures and spondylolisthesis posing significant challenges to its integrity and function. Spinal fractures arise from trauma, degenerative conditions, or osteoporosis, often affecting transitional zones like the thoracolumbar junction. Spondylolisthesis results from structural defects or degenerative changes, leading to vertebral displacement and potential neurological symptoms. Diagnostic and classification systems, such as AO Spine and TLICS, aid in evaluating instability and guiding treatment strategies. Advances in surgical techniques, including minimally invasive approaches, pedicle screws, interbody cages, and robotic-assisted systems, have improved precision and recovery while reducing morbidity. Vertebral augmentation techniques like vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty offer minimally invasive options for osteoporotic fractures. Despite these innovations, postoperative outcomes vary, with challenges such as persistent pain and hardware complications necessitating tailored interventions. Future directions emphasize predictive analytics and enhanced recovery strategies to optimize surgical outcomes and patient quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.