ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Reviewing the Genetic and Molecular Foundations of Congenital Spinal Deformities: Implications for Classification and Diagnosis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct regulation of Wnt signaling and EPZ5676 governs human UiPSM reprogramming via the CDX2/T/TBX6 core axis.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2026Article
- The role of genetics and molecular mechanisms in early onset scoliosis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2026Review
- Whole-Exome Sequencing of Discordant Monozygotic Twins for Congenital Scoliosis: A Family Case Study.Genes · 2025Article
- Perspectives from the 2024 International Consortium for Spinal Genetics, Development and Disease (ICSGDD).Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital spinal deformities (CSDs) are rare but severe conditions caused by abnormalities in vertebral development during embryogenesis. These deformities, including scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis, significantly impair patients' quality of life and present challenges in diagnosis and treatment. This review integrates genetic, molecular, and developmental insights to provide a comprehensive framework for classifying and understanding CSDs. Traditional classification systems based on morphological criteria, such as failures in vertebral formation, segmentation, or mixed defects, are evaluated alongside newer molecular-genetic approaches. Advances in genetic technologies, including whole-exome sequencing, have identified critical genes and pathways involved in somitogenesis and sclerotome differentiation, such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.