Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004642›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Feasibility and Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Intensive and Acute Cardiovascular Care.

Isabella Leo, Stefano Figliozzi, Jessica Ielapi, Federico Sicilia, Daniele Torella, Santo Dellegrottaglie, Anna Baritussio, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabella LeoRoyal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6NP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4774-0888
Stefano FigliozziIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.
Jessica IelapiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-8291-284X
Federico SiciliaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Daniele TorellaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-5084
Santo DellegrottaglieAdvanced Cardiovascular Imaging Unit, Clinica Villa dei Fiori, 80011 Acerra, Italy.
Anna BaritussioDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6900-6705
Chiara Bucciarelli-DucciRoyal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6NP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is established as a key imaging modality in a wide range of cardiovascular diseases and has an emerging diagnostic and prognostic role in selected patients presenting acutely. Recent technical advancements have improved the versatility of this imaging technique, which has become quicker and more detailed in both functional and tissue characterization assessments. Information derived from this test has the potential to change clinical management, guide therapeutic decisions, and provide risk stratification. This review aims to highlight the evolving diagnostic and prognostic role of CMR in this setting, whilst also providing practical guidance on which patients can benefit the most from CMR and which information can be derived from this test that will impact clinical management.

Indexed as

acute heart failurecardiac magnetic resonancecardiomyopathiestissue characterization

Identifiers

PMID40004642
PMCPMC11856486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.