Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004595›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing as Alternative Approach in Cases of Biventricular Pacing Failure.

Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou, Christina Chrysohoou, Panagiota Manolakou, Dimitrios Tsiachris, Athanasios Kordalis, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Konstantinos A Gatzoulis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Efficacy of multipoint versus conventional biventricular pacing in CRT: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christos-Konstantinos AntoniouFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 114 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4861-2404
Christina ChrysohoouFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 114 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6340-3996
Panagiota ManolakouFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 114 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios TsiachrisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 114 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4531-9712
Athanasios KordalisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 114 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4093-4601
Konstantinos TsioufisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 114 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-6725
Konstantinos A GatzoulisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, 114 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6628-0303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone in the treatment of dyssynchronous heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, the phenomenon of non-response has plagued CRT since its initial application. Notwithstanding issues such as failure to capture the left ventricle, lower-than-required pacing delivery percent, and failure to optimize atrioventricular and interventricular delays, there are patients who fail to exhibit an adequate response to CRT in its classical biventricular pacing (BiVP) form. Several modalities have been proposed as a means to remedy this issue, including pacing the conduction system itself-His or left bundle branch pacing, allowing for intrinsic conduction in some myocardial segments, pacing the left ventricle from multiple points in the coronary sinus (multipoint pacing), or even combining the above (e.g., His/left bundle pacing and BiVP leading to His/left bundle-optimized CRT). In the present review, we present recent evidence for the advantages and disadvantages of each modality and attempt to formulate a pathophysiology and simulation-based strategy to determine the best way forward for delivering CRT in non-responders to BiVP.

Indexed as

cardiac resynchronization therapyconduction system pacingleft ventricular resequencingmultipoint left ventricular pacing

Identifiers

PMID40004595
PMCPMC11856938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.