ArticleGenes2025
Human Papilloma Virus Infection in Men: A Specific Human Virome or a Specific Pathology?
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HPV-driven breast carcinogenesis: associations with tumor severity, Ki67 expression and metastasis.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) infections in men remain under-researched despite their critical role in disease transmission and the increasing incidence of HPV-related cancers. This study investigates the clinical and molecular characteristics of anogenital HPV infections in men, emphasizing genotype prevalence, diagnostic methods, and lesion variability.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 70 men aged 18-65 years with clinically diagnosed anogenital HPV infection. Lesions were characterized by morphology and location. HPV DNA was analyzed using INNO-LiPA (INNOvative Line Probe Assay), Hybrid Capture II (HC II), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to determine genotype distribution. Associations between clinical features and HPV genotypes were assessed using multivariate statistical analyses.
resultsLesions varied in morphology, with verrucous (52.86%) and papular (30%) types being the most common. Localization patterns showed predominance on the penis radix (34.29%) and shaft (27.14%). Molecular testing revealed HPV DNA in 88.57% of the cases using INNO-LiPA, compared to 45% and 40% with HC II and PCR, respectively. Low-risk (LR) genotypes, particularly HPV6, dominated single infections, comprising 68.57% of the cases, while high-risk (HR) genotypes accounted for 20%. Mixed LR and HR infections were observed in 14.29% of the lesions, with greater diversity noted in distal genital regions. Notably, condyloma plana and lesions on the inner prepuce exhibited a higher prevalence of HR and mixed infections. Age and lesion duration showed trends toward older patients and longer disease duration in cases involving perianal and extragenital condylomas, though these findings were not statistically significant. No direct correlation between lesion type or localization and specific genotypes was identified, underscoring the heterogeneity of HPV clinical manifestations in men.
conclusionsAnogenital HPV infections in men exhibit significant heterogeneity in lesion morphology, localization, and genotype distribution. HR HPV genotypes were detected in a notable proportion of benign lesions, underscoring their potential role in disease progression. INNO-LiPA proved superior in diagnostic accuracy, highlighting the need for standardized and cost-effective diagnostic approaches for men. Further research is crucial to elucidate HPV's clinical impact in men and inform prevention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.