Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004514›Full record

ReviewGenes2025

Integrating Machine Learning-Based Approaches into the Design of ASO Therapies.

Jamie Leckie, Toshifumi Yokota

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jamie LeckieDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3166-8973
Toshifumi YokotaDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare diseases impose a significant burden on affected individuals, caregivers, and healthcare systems worldwide. Developing effective therapeutics for these small patient populations presents substantial challenges. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach that targets the underlying genetic cause of disease at the RNA level. Several ASOs have gained FDA approval for the treatment of genetic conditions, including use in personalized N-of-1 trials. However, despite their potential, ASOs often exhibit limited clinical efficacy, and optimizing their design is a complex process influenced by numerous factors. Machine learning-based platforms, including eSkip-Finder and ASOptimizer, have been developed to address these challenges by predicting optimal ASO sequences and chemical modifications to enhance efficacy. eSkip-Finder focuses on exon-skipping applications, while ASOptimizer aims to optimize ASOs for RNA degradation. Preliminary in vitro results have demonstrated the promising predictive power of these platforms. However, limitations remain, including their generalizability to alternative targets and gaps in their consideration of all factors influencing ASO efficacy and safety. Continued advancements in machine learning models, alongside efforts to incorporate additional features affecting ASO efficacy and safety, hold significant promise for the field. These platforms have the potential to streamline ASO development, reduce associated costs, and improve clinical outcomes, positioning machine learning as a key tool in the future of ASO therapeutics.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOligonucleotides, AntisenseRare DiseasesHumansOligonucleotides, Antisenseantisense oligonucleotides (ASOs)ASOptimizerdesigneSkip-Findermachine learningrare disease

Identifiers

PMID40004514
PMCPMC11855077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.