ReviewGenes2025
Integrating Machine Learning-Based Approaches into the Design of ASO Therapies.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survivin-Targeting Antisense Oligonucleotides in Cancer Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Model selection in preclinical nucleic acid therapeutics research.Communications biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare diseases impose a significant burden on affected individuals, caregivers, and healthcare systems worldwide. Developing effective therapeutics for these small patient populations presents substantial challenges. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach that targets the underlying genetic cause of disease at the RNA level. Several ASOs have gained FDA approval for the treatment of genetic conditions, including use in personalized N-of-1 trials. However, despite their potential, ASOs often exhibit limited clinical efficacy, and optimizing their design is a complex process influenced by numerous factors. Machine learning-based platforms, including eSkip-Finder and ASOptimizer, have been developed to address these challenges by predicting optimal ASO sequences and chemical modifications to enhance efficacy. eSkip-Finder focuses on exon-skipping applications, while ASOptimizer aims to optimize ASOs for RNA degradation. Preliminary in vitro results have demonstrated the promising predictive power of these platforms. However, limitations remain, including their generalizability to alternative targets and gaps in their consideration of all factors influencing ASO efficacy and safety. Continued advancements in machine learning models, alongside efforts to incorporate additional features affecting ASO efficacy and safety, hold significant promise for the field. These platforms have the potential to streamline ASO development, reduce associated costs, and improve clinical outcomes, positioning machine learning as a key tool in the future of ASO therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.