Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004508›Full record

ArticleGenes2025

Genetic Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of "M82" in EMS-Mutagenized Tomato.

Yanchao Yang, Zhanming Tan, Shuang Liang, Wei Cheng, Yihuan Sun, Yunxia Cheng, Yu Song, Yongming Wang, Jialong Wu, Qi Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yanchao YangCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.
Zhanming TanCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2065-2172
Shuang LiangCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.
Wei ChengCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.
Yihuan SunCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.
Yunxia ChengCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.
Yu SongInstitute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China.
Yongming WangAgricultural Science Research Institute of the First Division, Alar 843300, China.
Jialong WuCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.
Qi WangCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Characteristic Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.

Funding

Corps Talent Support Plan Youth Project 00000000000First Division Alar City Science and Technology Plan Project - Soil Improvement and Green, Efficient Planting Technology Research and Demonstration for Facility Vegetables in Saline-Alkali Land of Southern Xinjiang 2024NY04the Corps Financial Science and Technology Plan Project - Key Technology Research on Intelligent Brackish Water Desalination Treatment and Safe Utilization in the Gobi Desert Facility Area of Southern Xinjiang 2023AB071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsIn this study, tomato seeds were treated with 2% EMS reagent for 12 h, 21 quality traits and 20 quantitative traits of 33 processed tomatoes derived from EMS-mutagenized"M82"were evaluated.

resultsThe results indicated that for traits such as hypocotyl color, growth habit, plant type, leaf type, and leaf shape, the range of quantitative trait variation was 8.45-37.25%, with a genetic diversity index ranging from 1.25 to 2.07.

conclusionsCluster analysis of quantitative traits categorized the 33 EMS-mutagenized "M82" processed tomato resources into five groups: Group I contained 22 robust germplasm samples; Group II consisted of a single potential high-quality germplasm; Group III comprised five germplasm with a small and extreme plant type; Group IV included four high-yield germplasm; and Group V represented one moderate, conventional germplasm. Raw data from 15 quantitative traits across the 33 accessions were standardized using the "extreme method" to extract six comprehensive factors. The top 10 germplasm resources based on the comprehensive score were 76, 137, 97, 102, 19, 104, 21, 108, 17, and 147. It provides some theoretical basis for realizing the high-yield and high-quality cultivation and variety breeding of processed tomatoes in Xinjiang.

Indexed as

Ethyl MethanesulfonateGenetic VariationMutagenesisSolanum lycopersicumPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociSeedsEthyl MethanesulfonateEMS mutagenesisgenetic diversityprocessed tomato

Identifiers

PMID40004508
PMCPMC11855828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.