Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004372›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Understanding the Effect of Waiting for the Dissolution of Sodium Hydroxide in Geopolymer Concrete Mixes.

Samara Altameemi, Blessing O Adeleke, John M Kinuthia, Jonathan Oti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samara AltameemiFaculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK.
Blessing O AdelekeFaculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6702-4811
John M KinuthiaFaculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3273-846X
Jonathan OtiFaculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5968-5089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete (GPC) can be produced by the chemical activation of industrial by-products and processed natural minerals that contain aluminosilicates with the presence of an alkaline activator. Raw components are one of the critical parameters affecting geopolymer performance. On the other hand, the mixing procedure of geopolymer concrete is not any less important. Few demonstrative constructions have been built using GPC as a greener alternative to Portland cement concrete. Numerous variables affect GPC manufacture, such as raw material specification, activator type and dosage, and curing regimes. Despite the conventions of the building industry, the lack of proper mix design methods limits the wide acceptance of GPC in the industry. This report conducted experimental trials on GGBS-based GPC to optimize a mixing design procedure to achieve best mechanical strength and structural integrity. Geopolymer concrete properties were evaluated through slump and unconfined compressive strength tests. The laboratory trials in this report revealed that all geopolymer mixes, except SD0HV and 1W-SG, exhibited high workability values. Also, the presence of an alkaline activator was vital to attain satisfactory compressive strength values. The alkaline activator could be used when cooled and reached room temperature after two hours of preparation and was not necessary after 24 h. Mix G-(0.5W-S) with a 0.5A.A. (alkaline activator)/precursor (GGBS) ratio, SSA (sodium silicate alternative)/SH (sodium hydroxide with 10 M molarity) ratio of 1:1, and 0.55 W/B (water to binder) ratio is recommended to achieve best mechanical performance and structural integrity.

Indexed as

alkaline activatorgeopolymer concrete mix procedureground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)

Identifiers

PMID40004372
PMCPMC11857545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.