Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40004356›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Turning Waste into Greener Cementitious Building Material: Treatment Methods for Biomass Ashes-A Review.

Fatih Bülbül, Luc Courard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatih BülbülUrban and Environmental Engineering, University of Liège, Quartier Polytech 1-Allée de la Découverte 9, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8741-2275
Luc CourardUrban and Environmental Engineering, University of Liège, Quartier Polytech 1-Allée de la Découverte 9, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6573-6631

Funding

Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of biomass ash (BA) is expected to increase in the future, as biomass is generally considered a carbon-neutral fuel. BA potentially concentrates heavy metals and trace elements at high levels. With the growing production of BA, its disposal in landfills or recycling must be addressed through solid waste policies and within the framework of a circular economy. Utilizing BA as a cement substitute solves disposal issues while offering environmental benefits aligned with the circular economy. However, the varying physical and chemical properties of BA, influenced by factors such as biomass type and combustion technique, necessitate more effective utilization strategies. Consequently, researchers are developing various treatment methods to ensure that BA meet the necessary requirements and do not pose problems such as heavy metal or chlorine leaching. These treatments facilitate the production of concrete with higher compressive strength at greater cement replacement levels, supporting greener construction practices. This review consolidates existing BA data and treatment methods, focusing on their impacts and efficiency. It also explores combined treatments and potential new approaches. By providing a foundation for future research and practical applications, this study aims to improve treatment techniques, helping the industry mitigate environmental risks and advance carbon-neutral construction solutions.

Indexed as

biomass ashcarbonationcementgrindinghydrothermal synthesisleachingmicro-grindingsubstitution

Identifiers

PMID40004356
PMCPMC11857695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.