ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Properties and Behavior of Sandy Soils by a New Interpretation of MICP.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of Bacterial-to-Cementation Solution Ratio for MICP-Treated Sand: Effects on Compressibility and Slope Erosion Resistance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation and Utilization of Aged Bacteria in MICP Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on MICP technology for ground improvement began in the early 2000s, and since then, it has been considered as innovative research. The field of applications is showing signs of expanding from sandy soil stabilization to remediation. However, the research has not always progressed, because it is extremely difficult to evaluate the ability (viability rate) related to microorganisms and how to handle them quantitatively. In fact, this problem hinders the consensus of research results in terms of quantitative evaluation of microorganisms and the cross-comparison (evaluation) and use of MICP technology research. The crucial disadvantage of using bacteria is that their properties are not constant due to changes over time and in the surrounding environment. Therefore, for engineering purposes, we used the carbonate formation rate (CPR), instead of urease activity, as a function of the microbial mass (OD) with viable bacteria. Thus, the standard OD-CPR relationship was defined experimentally, and the estimation method of viability was established. The required amount of microorganisms for testing was given by OD*, and the relationship "OD = Rcv OD*" was defined to convert from OD* to OD. Rcv was defined as the viable bacterial rate. It was found that the Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.