ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Cement Remaining After Debonding and Polishing in Lingual Multibracket Appliance Using Planning Imaging 3D Software.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of a novel digital technique to analyze the remaining cement after debonding lingual multibracket appliances and after polishing the remaining cement.
methodsThirteen teeth were embedded in an epoxy resin simulating a dental arch and subsequently a digital impression was taken using an intraoral scanner; obtaining a standard tessellation language (STL1) digital file. Lingual multibracket appliances were bonded and debonded on the lingual surfaces of all teeth and another digital impression was made (STL2). Finally, the polishing procedure of the remaining cement was performed and a digital impression was taken (STL3). The teeth were individually segmented from the digital files and an alignment was performed between STL1 and STL2 and between STL1 and STL3 digital files using specific cephalometric 2D/3D software to assess the remaining cement after debonding and after polishing lingual multibracket appliances. The reproducibility and repeatability capacity of the measurement digital method was assessed using a Gage R&R statistical analysis.
resultsThe results were assessed by a statistical program and showed a statistically significant (
conclusionsThe use of novel digital diagnosis software is a repeatable, reproducible, and accurate measurement technique to analyze the remaining cement after debonding lingual multibracket appliances and after polishing the remaining cement. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The diagnosis cephalometric software evaluation of the polishing technique with different materials, burs or polishing sequences brings the research closer to the clinical field. This methodology allows the orthodontist to clinically measure the cement remnants after polishing without the need for teeth extraction and with current clinic objects such as intraoral scanning and orthodontic cephalometric software. This might give orthodontics more clearance in terms of better burs or protocols for polishing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.