ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Flexural Performance Analysis of Composite Beam with Reinforced HPFRCC Precast Shell.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigation on Shear Behavior of Precast Monolithic ECC Composite Beams.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To enhance the mechanical properties of precast composite beams, High-Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composite (HPFRCC) material was used instead of ordinary concrete in the precast shell with reinforced bars to form the R/HPFRCC precast shell composite beam. By controlling different reinforcement ratios, post-longitudinal reinforcement treatment methods, mold shell materials, and loading methods, nine test beams were designed, and four-point bending loading tests were carried out to study the flexural bearing capacity, failure mode, failure process, deformation capacity, and influencing factors of composite beams. The R/HPFRCC prefabricated shell composite beams presented good mechanical performance and integrity. Compared with the RC shell composite beams, the R/HPFRCC prefabricated shell composite beam increased the yield and peak loads by 6.6% and 10.3%, respectively. Using HPFRCC material instead of ordinary concrete in the prefabricated shell could reduce the damage degree of the composite beam under bending. Under the same load, the reinforcement strain in the R/HPFRCC precast shell was smaller than that of the RC precast shell and the cast-in-situ RC beam; thus, the yield of longitudinal reinforcement was effectively delayed. Considering the HPFRCC material mechanical properties, a calculated model for the ultimate load-carrying capacity of R/HPFRCC precast shell composite beams was established. The calculated values were in good agreement with the experimental values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.