ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Eosinophil-Driven vs. Eosinophil-Associated Severe Asthma: Practical Implications for Target Treatment.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to benralizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- A clinician-oriented machine learning model for adult asthma exacerbation prediction: comparative analysis of nine algorithms.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Dupilumab-Related Hypereosinophilia in Patients Treated for Type 2 Diseases: Evidence from a 24-Month Prospective Real-Life Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Single-cell transcriptome sequencing reveals immunological mechanisms by which recombinant Echinococcus granulosus P29 protein alleviates airway inflammation in mice with allergic asthma.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Reduced IL-10 production by FoxP3+IL-10+ Treg cells is partially compensated by complosome-associated induction of regulatory FoxP3-IL-10+ T cells in allergic eosinophilic asthma.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2026Article
- Pulsed 980 nm near-infrared photobiomodulation attenuates OVA-induced allergic asthma by modulating Th2 cytokine responses and inflammatory cell infiltration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Severe Dry Cough Followed by Eosinophilia Without Pulmonary Infiltrates After Dupilumab Treatment in Patients with Severe Asthma: A Series of Five Cases.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe asthma (SA) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting approximately 10% of asthmatic patients, and eosinophils are considered key pathogenetic actors in a significant number of patients. Biological therapies have been demonstrated to improve asthma control by decreasing exacerbation rates and reducing the use of oral corticosteroids. In this context, phenotyping and endotyping patients with SA is essential for selecting the most effective therapeutic approach. For this purpose, biomarkers such as IgE, absolute blood eosinophil count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are crucial in defining a patient's inflammatory profile. Their integration provides a framework for classifying asthma into T2-high, T2-mild, or T2-low categories, guiding personalized treatment strategies. By incorporating multiple biomarkers into a unified model, it is possible to better stratify patients and optimize biologic therapy selection, paving the way for improved outcomes in SA management. This review aims to evaluate the role of phenotyping and endotyping SA patients, with particular attention to the impact of eosinophilic inflammation and combinatory biomarkers on decision-making processes for the selection of biological therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.