ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Risk Prediction of RNA Off-Targets of CRISPR Base Editors in Tissue-Specific Transcriptomes Using Language Models.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Workflow for Fine-Tuning and Evaluating DNA Language Models for Specific Genomics Issues.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Genome Editing and Bioinformatics: Addressing Challenges in Genome Editing Implementation and Genome Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Base-editing technologies, particularly cytosine base editors (CBEs), allow precise gene modification without introducing double-strand breaks; however, unintended RNA off-target effects remain a critical concern and are under studied. To address this gap, we developed the Pipeline for CRISPR-induced Transcriptome-wide Unintended RNA Editing (PiCTURE), a standardized computational pipeline for detecting and quantifying transcriptome-wide CBE-induced RNA off-target events. PiCTURE identifies both canonical ACW (W = A or T/U) motif-dependent and non-canonical RNA off-targets, revealing a broader WCW motif that underlies many unanticipated edits. Additionally, we developed two machine learning models based on the DNABERT-2 language model, termed STL and SNL, which outperformed motif-only approaches in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. To demonstrate the practical application of our predictive model for CBE-induced RNA off-target risk, we integrated PiCTURE outputs with the Predicting RNA Off-target compared with Tissue-specific Expression for Caring for Tissue and Organ (PROTECTiO) pipeline and estimated RNA off-target risk for each transcript showing tissue-specific expression. The analysis revealed differences among tissues: while the brain and ovaries exhibited relatively low off-target burden, the colon and lungs displayed relatively high risks. Our study provides a comprehensive framework for RNA off-target profiling, emphasizing the importance of advanced machine learning-based classifiers in CBE safety evaluations and offering valuable insights to inform the development of safer genome-editing therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.