Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40003774›Full record

ReviewInsects2025

Advances and Current Status in the Use of Cuticular Hydrocarbons for Forensic Entomology Applications.

David Stewart-Yates, Garth L Maker, Stefano D'Errico, Paola A Magni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Stewart-YatesSchool of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Garth L MakerSchool of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1666-9377
Stefano D'ErricoDepartment of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 24149 Trieste, Italy.
Paola A MagniSchool of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7822-8126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) are long-chain lipids found on the exoskeletons of insects, serving primarily as a protective barrier against water loss and environmental factors. In the last few decades, the qualitative and quantitative analysis of CHCs, particularly in blow flies, has emerged as a valuable tool in forensic entomology, offering promising potential for species identification and age estimation of forensically important insects. This review examines the current application of CHC analysis in forensic investigations and highlights the significant advancements in the field over the past few years. Studies have demonstrated that CHC profiles vary with insect development, and while intra-species variability exists due to factors such as age, sex, geographical location, and environmental conditions, these variations can be harnessed to refine post-mortem interval (PMI) estimations and improve the accuracy of forensic entomological evidence. Notably, CHC analysis can also aid in distinguishing between multiple generations of insects on a body, providing insights into post-mortem body movement and aiding in the interpretation of PMI in complex cases. Furthermore, recent studies have investigated the variability and degradation of CHCs over time, revealing how environmental factors-such as temperature, humidity, UV light exposure, and toxicological substances-affect CHC composition, providing valuable insights for forensic investigations. Despite the promise of CHC profiling, several challenges remain, and this review also aims to highlight future research directions to enhance the reliability of this technique in forensic casework.

Indexed as

age estimationblow flieschemical analysesenvironmental factorsPMIspecies identification

Identifiers

PMID40003774
PMCPMC11855814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.