ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Association Between Nephrolith Size and Location and Grade of Hydronephrosis.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Etiological Spectrum and Anatomical Locations of Hydronephrosis in Western Region of Yemen.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research investigated the unstudied impact, in 416 cases of stone-induced hydronephrosis detected radiographically in 369 patients, of stone size on the stone's location in the urinary tract and on the hydronephrosis grade. Most (62.5%) of the hydronephrosis cases were Grade 2; 17.1%, Grade 3; 10.6%, Grade 4; and 9.9%, Grade 1. The mean size of the stones reported in the renal pelvis, pelviureteric junction (PUJ), upper ureter (UU), midureter (MU), lower ureter (LU), and vesicoureteral junction (VUJ) that caused hydronephrosis were 23.03 ± 8.97 mm, 15.56 ± 6.59 mm, 12.91 ± 6.02 mm, 11.05 ± 4.27 mm, 10.41 ± 4.80 mm, and 6.73 ± 3.28 mm, respectively. The mean size of Grade 1-causing stones was 16.63 mm; Grade 2, 11.49 mm; Grade 3, 15.69 mm; and Grade 4, 21.23 mm. The mean stone size significantly decreased from the renal pelvis, through the PUJ, UU, MU, and LU, and down to the VUJ and increased as the hydronephrosis grade increased from Grade 2 to Grade 4. In conclusion, large-size stones were predominantly located in the renal pelvis and PUJ, with few located in the lower ureter, and no large stones reached the VUJ. Small-size stones were mostly located in the VUJ, with only one stone in the PUJ, and no small-size stones were present in the renal pelvis. Large-size stones caused severe hydronephrosis, and small-size stones caused grade 2 hydronephrosis. Increases in stone size decreased its passage rate in the ureter and increased the chance of causing high-grade hydronephrosis. These results alert urologists to adopt faster therapeutic procedures for larger stone sizes to reduce renal damage caused by obstructive uropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.