ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Clinical Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Biomarker Signature to Predict Response to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Alone or Combined with Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Study Protocol and Review.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker Detection of Lung Cancers Before Clinical Symptoms or the Use of Traditional Imaging Methods in the ITALUNG Trial.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Trial
- Review
- Article
- The role of NADFrontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Delta-Radiomics Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Treated with Cetuximab Plus Avelumab (CAVE Trial).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the Genetic Orchestra of Cancer: The Interplay Between Oncogenes and Tumor-Suppressor Genes.Cancers · 2025Review
- Active monitoring vs. spontaneous reporting of antineoplastic drug-related adverse drug reactions: evidence from the Chinese hospital pharmacovigilance system.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a severe condition with high rates of illness and death. Current treatments are limited and not always effective because the cancer responds differently to drugs in different patients. This research aims to use artificial intelligence (AI) to improve treatment by predicting which therapies will work best for individual patients. By analyzing large sets of patient data and using machine learning, we hope to create a model that can identify which patients will respond to chemotherapy, either alone or combined with other targeted treatments. The study will involve dividing patients into training and validation sets to develop and test the models, avoiding overfitting. Various machine learning algorithms, like random survival forest and neural networks, will be integrated to develop a highly accurate and stable predictive model. The model's performance will be evaluated using statistical measures such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). The aim is to personalize treatments, improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and make the treatment process more efficient. If successful, this research could significantly impact the medical community by providing a new tool for better managing and treating mCRC, leading to more personalized and effective cancer care. In addition, we examine the applicability of learning methods to biomarker discovery and therapy prediction by considering recent narrative publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.